I was typing out a root-relative link in some Wordpress site this week, and remembered learning about them in “taking your talent to the web”. That was an influential book, it really explained the basics of this new web design thing so well. Another tidbit that came back: gifs stay crunchy in milk, jpegs do not.
The CMS_ui project dedicated some posts of the Drupal views module user interface from 2006, 2008 and 2011. I was heavily involved in that (1, 2 ), it was one of my first substantial contributions to the project as a designer. Still proud of this concept model.
Oh look, illuminated initials. Reviewing my two most recent journals, the abstract calligraphic initial and the medieval ways of stylized drawing are recurring themes. I think I'll explore next steps in both. As a refresher, I have started works from the second Calligraphic Space series to my instagram.
I said “write.as is quite nice”, but that's only part of what happened here.
What made this instant publishing possible is that the source material for this post was already there as a note in my notes collection. I'm not comfortable with that type of coherent twitter thread that consists of one well worded full sentence per tweet. Which at the same time is the kind of tweetage that I find some of the most valuable.
I think to slowly, write even slower to respond in kind to this type of discussion. I don't want to “be on Twitter” while trying to think/write my perspective.
(Also, these used to be blog posts and I still think it's worth the effort to share this kind of thinking under your own URL instead of under the platform ones.)
What happened here is I already had some thoughts on this topic in a note. The initial tweet reminded me I had been thinking about that topic. I found that note, added and rewrote a bit and posted it to my blog. Even after posting I updated the post to add the two examples at the bottom.
I'm currently using Obsidian.md to do this soilwork of taking notes, writing down thoughts and linking them. Basic ingredients are local markdown text files. Write.as is a very light-weight publishing tool that also works well with markdown. Both Obsidian and Write.as follow the #hashtag convention for tagging things. The “share to twitter” feature in Write.as managed to send those along as part of the tweet I see. Nice.
The most obvious reason to create separate content types is because different content structure, different fields.
Other reasons to define a separate content type can go beyond differences in the needed field structure:
Different editorial workflows.
Governance: difference in content life cycles.
A simple(?) way to segment who can access what
Yes, there are other tools available to achieve the above (i.e. taxonomy, roles, groups in Drupal parlance), but at a certain point, the maintenace and complexity cost of DRY (don't repeat yourself) can become too high.
The definition of the function of a content type is a wider consideration than its functional-structural definition on field level alone.
(I suspect there's an analogy to be made here with object oriented code. Not all giraffes, kangaroos, wolves, mice, cows, lemurs should be instances of the same mammal class?)
An example of “all in one”: in one case we pushed really hard on gathering wildly variable service-related content into a single content type for:
future extensibility. Much of the service was info at first. Actual handling of service requests (order this, request that, subscribe to) will be added over time and can be made available across the whole set.
governance: tighter control of who can create these items to reduce the chance of duplication, which was a problem
At the same time we created different versions of a training because even if most fields were shared, which ones were required varied greatly. No meaningful (predictable) shared set of what we could assume to be available. Hard to create view modes for that.
“Being present in Life is to be emergent in the moment, not scripted. A lot of work depends upon people running their day by consciously pre-planned tasks in linear succession: It's no wonder most all self-help methods with aspirations for commercial success are the same.” @socialwealth
I'm looking at how people use their journals, bullet or otherwise. An important aspect for me is that in my creative journal, the work can be undirected, free flowing. Anything goes. A place for process over results.